“Scope creep is the silent killer of projects. It doesn’t just derail timelines—it erodes trust, burns out teams, and compromises quality.”
Scope creep, the gradual expansion of a project’s goals or deliverables, is a common challenge in project management. While it often starts with good intentions—a client’s extra request, a stakeholder’s “quick addition”—it can spiral into ethical dilemmas that jeopardize team well-being, stakeholder trust, and project success.
Consider the real-world example of the U.S. government’s Healthcare.gov website. Launched in 2013 as part of the Affordable Care Act, the project was initially scoped to provide a user-friendly platform for Americans to compare and purchase health insurance. However, last-minute additions, such as integrating with legacy systems and accommodating state-specific requirements, led to significant technical issues at launch. The website crashed frequently, users faced long wait times, and many were unable to enroll. The project, originally budgeted at 93.7 million, ballooned to over 1.7 billion due to scope creep and rework (U.S. Government Accountability Office [GAO], 2014)1.
This scenario highlights the ethical tightrope project managers walk when scope creep arises. When do you push back? And how do you balance client satisfaction with ethical responsibility? Let’s dive in.
🗝️ Key Takeaways
- Scope creep often stems from overpromising and poor communication.
- Ethical dilemmas arise when teams are overworked to meet expanding demands.
- Project managers must advocate for realistic expectations and team well-being.
- Clear contracts and change management processes can mitigate scope creep.
- Pushing back on scope creep protects trust, quality, and long-term relationships.
1. Scope Creep Often Stems from Overpromising and Poor Communication 🗣️
Scope creep rarely starts with malice. It often begins with a project manager or team member saying, “Sure, we can do that!” without fully considering the implications. Overpromising, whether to please a client or avoid conflict, sets the stage for ethical challenges.
For example, a study by the Project Management Institute (PMI) found that 52% of projects experience scope creep, often due to unclear requirements and poor communication (PMI, 2021).2 When teams fail to set boundaries, stakeholders assume additional requests are fair game.
Actionable Insight: Always underpromise and overdeliver. Use clear, written agreements to define project scope and communicate the impact of changes upfront.
2. Ethical Dilemmas Arise When Teams Are Overworked to Meet Expanding Demands 🚨
One of the most significant ethical implications of scope creep is its toll on team well-being. When project scope expands without adjustments to timelines or resources, teams are forced to work longer hours, often at the expense of their health and personal lives.
A notable example of this occurred during the development of the video game Cyberpunk 2077 by CD Projekt Red. Initially announced in 2012, the game underwent numerous scope changes, including the addition of complex features like a sprawling open world, advanced AI, and multiple narrative paths. These changes, combined with pressure to meet a highly publicized release date, led to extreme crunch conditions for the development team. Employees reported working 12-16 hour days, including weekends, for months leading up to the launch. The stress and burnout resulted in significant turnover and public criticism of the company’s labor practices (Schreier, 2020)3.
Despite the team’s efforts, the game launched with numerous bugs and performance issues, particularly on older consoles, leading to refunds, a temporary removal from the PlayStation Store, and a tarnished reputation for the studio. This case underscores how overworking teams to meet expanding demands can harm both employees and the final product.
Actionable Insight: Prioritize team well-being by pushing back on unrealistic demands. Use data to show stakeholders the human cost of scope creep.
3. Project Managers Must Advocate for Realistic Expectations and Team Well-Being 🛡️
Project managers play a critical role in balancing stakeholder expectations with ethical practices. They must act as advocates for their teams, ensuring that additional requests are evaluated for feasibility and impact.
A real-world example of this can be seen in the construction of the Sydney Opera House. Originally planned to be completed in four years with a budget of $7 million, the project faced significant scope creep due to design changes and technical challenges. The project manager, Ove Arup, and his team were tasked with implementing architect Jørn Utzon’s ambitious vision, which included complex engineering feats like the iconic shell-shaped roofs.
As the project progressed, stakeholders pushed for additional features and design modifications. Recognizing the strain on the team and the potential for delays, Arup and his team conducted detailed analyses of the time and cost implications of each change. They presented these findings to stakeholders, emphasizing the need for realistic timelines and additional resources. This transparent approach led to a compromise: some features were scaled back, while others were phased in over time. Although the project ultimately took 14 years to complete and cost $102 million, the proactive management of scope creep ensured the team’s well-being and preserved the project’s iconic quality (Drew, 1999)4.
Actionable Insight: Use data and transparency to justify pushback. Involve stakeholders in discussions about trade-offs.
4. Clear Contracts and Change Management Processes Can Mitigate Scope Creep 📝
One of the most effective ways to prevent scope creep is through clear contracts and robust change management processes. These tools ensure that any changes to the project scope are documented, evaluated, and approved before implementation.
A case study from the Harvard Business Review highlighted how a tech company reduced scope creep by 30% after implementing a formal change request process (HBR, 2020)5. This process included a review of the impact on timelines, budgets, and resources, ensuring that all stakeholders were aligned.
Actionable Insight: Establish a formal change management process and include it in project contracts.
5. Pushing Back on Scope Creep Protects Trust, Quality, and Long-Term Relationships 🤝
While pushing back on scope creep can feel uncomfortable, it’s often necessary to protect the project’s integrity and maintain stakeholder trust. When teams deliver on their original promises, they build a reputation for reliability and professionalism.
A notable example of this is the approach taken by IDEO, a global design and innovation consultancy. IDEO is known for its human-centered design process, which emphasizes collaboration and clear communication with clients. In one instance, a client requested significant additions to a product design project midway through the timeline. Instead of immediately accommodating the request, IDEO’s project managers conducted a thorough analysis of the impact on resources, timelines, and costs. They presented this analysis to the client, explaining how the changes would compromise the quality of the final product and strain the team.
By framing the conversation around the shared goal of delivering a high-quality outcome, IDEO successfully negotiated a phased approach to the additional features. This not only preserved the project’s integrity but also strengthened the client’s trust in IDEO’s expertise. The client appreciated the transparency and returned for future projects, citing IDEO’s commitment to quality and ethical practices as key reasons for their loyalty (Brown, 2009)6.
Actionable Insight: Frame pushback as a commitment to quality and trust. Use past successes to demonstrate the value of sticking to the original scope.
💡 Actionable Insights
- Underpromise and overdeliver to manage expectations.
- Prioritize team well-being by pushing back on unrealistic demands.
- Use data and transparency to justify pushback.
- Establish a formal change management process.
- Frame pushback as a commitment to quality and trust.
🌟 Conclusion
Scope creep isn’t just a project management challenge—it’s an ethical minefield. Overpromising, overworking teams, and misleading stakeholders can have far-reaching consequences for trust, quality, and team morale. By setting clear boundaries, advocating for realistic expectations, and implementing robust processes, project managers can navigate scope creep ethically and effectively.
The next time a stakeholder asks for “just one more thing,” remember: pushing back isn’t just about protecting the project—it’s about upholding integrity.
Have you faced ethical dilemmas due to scope creep? Share your experiences in the comments below! 💬👇
Want more insights on ethical project management? Subscribe to our newsletter for weekly tips and strategies. 📩
What’s the most challenging scope creep situation you’ve encountered, and how did you handle it? Let’s discuss! 💭
- U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2014). Healthcare.gov: Ineffective planning and oversight practices undermined successful implementation of the federal marketplace. GAO-14-694. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-14-694 ↩︎
- Project Management Institute. (2021). Pulse of the Profession: Beyond Agility. PMI. ↩︎
- Schreier, J. (2020, December 16). Cyberpunk 2077’s development was a mess, according to CD Projekt Red staff. Bloomberg. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com ↩︎
- Drew, P. (1999). The masterpiece: Jørn Utzon, a secret life. South Yarra, Australia: Hardie Grant Books. ↩︎
- Harvard Business Review. (2020). How to manage scope creep in complex projects. HBR. ↩︎
- Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business. ↩︎
